Michael Freeman in Michael Freeman’s Photo School – Black % White (Ilex, 2012) notes that
‘…unlike colour imagery, in which we can utilize universally recognized color charts and color profiles to ensure a consistent and “accurate” treatment, when converting to black and white we have only our own inherent sense of what looks right to go by. Yellows should appear bright, for example, while blues and purples should be darker; but its certainly not a precise science- there are no universally recognised grayscale “values” for the different colors. We cannot apply a scale of “brightness” that shadows each color’s unique wavelength in the visible spectrum.’
What this means is that red and blue, for example, if converted to a tonal value based on wavelength would result in either of them (because they are close on the visible spectrum) being rendered as either very light or very dark or the other way round. This is not a drawback as Freeman notes that the lack of a measurable scale for gray allows us to experiment with tone for creative impact.
A further consideration, again noted by freeman is that by stripping out colour information from a scene shape and form, rather than the literal subject matter, become much easier to discern.
In this exercise, a still life with gray, red, yellow, green and blue elements has been digitally manipulated in Photoshop Elements with Silver Efex Pro as a plug in. In the images below, in turn, the original image shot as a jpeg in colour is shown, followed by the default black and white conversion then successively with each of the red, yellow, blue and green filters in Silver Efex Pro. No further manipulation was undertaken on the images.
The impact of converting with the different colour filters is quite dramatic with red and yellow producing images in which there is a wide range of tonal values and in which the form of the different still life elements is quite great. The use of the green filter produces an image that is midway between the blue filter output and the red and yellow. The use of the blue filter produces an image of relatively little tonal range. The likely reason for the low tonal range in the blue image is that the cream background has been filtered out.
In addition to the required images for the exercise as described above I have included two additional images below. In the first, a straight image of blue sky with frost covered birch tree in the foreground. In the second image the black and white converter and sliders in Photoshop elements were used so as to darken the blue sky and lighten still further the white tree; an extreme conversion but one that, in black and white, conforms to our expectations of bright white and dark blue.
The use of filters in traditional film based black and white photography is exemplified in the work of Ansel Adams. In his Aspens image from Northern New Mexico (1958) he notes his choice (Ansel Adams, Examples. the making of 40 Photographs, Little Brown and Company, 1983)) of a yellow filter to reduce the shaded ground values and highlight the subject. In contrast, Adams used a green filter in his image of White House Ruin in 1942 to better define the sunlit areas, darken shadows and lighten yellow and green values.
In the feedback from Assignment One it was pointed out that I needed to consider why I opted for black and white and why rather than how I took photographs. The exercises to date have started to give me a glimmer of why I take certain photographs in colour and to move on from the ‘how’ I make images. This has come about as a result of having confidence in my ability to technically replicate images at will rather than by accident and thus allow myself to think more about why I make certain images. In black and white, however, the exercise and the underpinning thinking about the technicality of the images has shown me that I have a lot to learn technically before I can starting thinking about why I make these types of images.